Monday, December 13, 2010

Angry Hate Group.

  •  The Family Research Council and the American Family Association are angry that they are listed as a hate group with the Southern Poverty Law Center. For some reason, they think it is because they are a christian group. The SPLC has strict guide lines which clearly state that religious beliefs are not a reason to be added to the list.
  • The reasons for the FRC and AFA being added is that they repeatedly spread false information based on junk science and hate.
  • Click on any link for a good look at what is being said by these groups.
What gets me is the media puts these people on and treats them as if they are some kind of authority. Would the media put the leader of the KKK or some skinhead on and let them spread hate and misinformation?

The freedom of speech does not give license to spread hate or falsehoods.

Tell GOP: Don't Censor Free Expression


Boehner, Cantor and other right-wing leaders have attacked the exhibit as a questionable use of taxpayer money, even though Smithsonian exhibits including this one are privately funded. They are now threatening to go after Smithsonian public funding and even to launch investigations into Smithsonian exhibits.

Tell the House Republican Leadership to stay out of the censorship game and to keep their hands off Smithsonian funding.

Saturday, December 11, 2010

Hate Group Solidarity Against Filthy Queers

 

I picked this up at Joe My God. I am so tired of the arguments between them and us. We have real facts and educated people and orgs. on our side. They have made up and twisted "facts, people, and orgs..

Please read to the end where you can see for yourself why these groups are on the hate list. (The SPLC does not put them on the list for their religious beliefs. They are on the list for the amount and repeated lies they tell.)

Family Research Council Calls For Hate Group Solidarity Against Filthy Queers


Over at Good As You, activist Jeremy Hooper has somehow uncovered a not-yet issued press release from the Family Research Council in which they call for the nation's anti-gay hate groups to stand in solidarity against the Southern Poverty Law Center's designations of anti-gay hate groups.

In today's second death-of-irony alert, the document is titled Start Debating: Stop Hating. Because according to the Family Research Council, we are the haters in this game.

The surest sign one is losing a debate is to resort to character assassination. The Southern Poverty Law Center, a liberal fundraising machine whose tactics have been condemned by observers across the political spectrum, is doing just that.

The group, which was once known for combating racial bigotry, is now attacking several groups that uphold Judeo-Christian moral views, including marriage as the union of a man and a woman. How does the SPLC attack? By labeling its opponents “hate groups.” No discussion. No consideration of the issues. No engagement. No debate

These type of slanderous tactics have been used against voters who signed petitions and voted for marriage amendments in all thirty states that have considered them, as well as against the millions of Americans who identify with the Tea Party movement. Some on the Left have even impugned the Manhattan Declaration-which upholds the sanctity of life, the value of traditional marriage and the fundamental right of religious freedom-as an anti-gay document and have forced its removal from general communications networks.

This is intolerance pure and simple. Elements of the radical Left are trying to shut down informed discussion of policy issues that are being considered by Congress, legislatures, and the courts. Tell the radical Left it is time to stop spreading hateful rhetoric attacking individuals and organizations merely for expressing ideas with which they disagree. Our debates can and must remain civil - but they must never be suppressed through personal assaults that aim only to malign an opponents character.

You can take action by adding your name to the following statement:

We, the undersigned, stand in solidarity with Family Research Council, American Family Association, Concerned Women of America, National Organization for Marriage, Liberty Counsel and other pro-family organizations that are working to protect and promote natural marriage and family. We support the vigorous but responsible exercise of the First Amendment rights of free speech and religious liberty that are the birthright of all Americans.
Over at Right Wing Watch, People For The American Way reminds us exactly who the haters are with a link farm to recent statements by the above-listed groups.

Thursday, December 9, 2010

UTAH: Parents Upset Over Gay Suicide Signs Posted Near Elementary School

I think this guy is brave and doing the right thing. We have kids in elementary school killing themselves so this is a way to open the conversation at a level the kids can understand.
Why is it OK for people like Fred Phelps to have signs and HATE groups to be on TV spreading lies but it is not OK for this man to have a sign telling the truth on his property?
From Joe My God.



Administrators and parents at a Utah elementary school are upset because a man who lives adjacent to the school has posted the above signs.
Leonard Ridley lives next to Art City Elementary in Springville. He recently posted three signs on his fence, facing the playground after he read news about the recent rash of gay suicides. "The signs of course say stop gay suicide, tell the truth, gays are born gay," Ridley said. "I realized at that point that I was in an enviable location in back of the school and this would be an opportunity to provide information to the children tat would be carried to the adults in their lives, to the teachers, to their parents in particular and carry information concerning homosexuals and homosexuality that would perhaps contradict with the mistaken ideas that they already had."
Saying that many parents had complained, school officials said that suicide was an inappropriate subject for elementary school students. The city has declared that the size of the signs exceed zoning codes and Ridley has agreed to post only one sign at a time.

Facebook To Reimburse Gay Staffers For Partner Benefit Tax Inequities

Facebook is joining the small but growing list of companies who are reimbursing their gay employees for the tax inequities incurred by carrying their partners on their insurance.
The new policies follow similar announcements by Barclays, and also this year, Google. A handful of other large organizations, including Cisco, Kimpton Hotels and the Gates Foundation also cover these costs. Under federal law, employer-provided health benefits for domestic partners are counted as taxable income, if the partner is not considered a dependent. The tax owed is based on the value of the partner’s coverage paid by the employer.
Gay employees pay about $1100 more annually than heterosexual married employees who insure their spouses.

Wednesday, December 8, 2010

First Commercial Space Vehicle Launches Test Flight From Cape Canaveral

As you all know, I am big on space travel so this is a very important piece of history.
A private company has launched a spacecraft in a bold demonstration test for NASA. The Space Exploration Technologies rocket blasted off from Cape Canaveral on Wednesday morning. The Falcon 9 is carrying a capsule named Dragon. The company, known as SpaceX, hopes to place the capsule in orbit and then bring it back to Earth three hours later. It will be the first time a commercial business tries to recover a spacecraft re-entering from orbit. The plan is for Dragon to circle the world twice, then parachute into the Pacific Ocean, 500 miles off the Mexican coast. NASA is hiring companies like SpaceX to haul supplies to the International Space Station following next year's shuttle retirement. Taxi trips for astronauts may follow.

Colbert on DADT

Monday, December 6, 2010

A Dad and his Son.

This morning I read the letter this man wrote about his struggle to accept and support his son who was a gay teen. They formed a group to help other parents and their kids called the Family Acceptance Project.  Very touching.

Here is the video of their story. Get a tissue first.

Study: Gay Teens More Likely to Be Punished

This story was written by Washington Post staff writer Donna St. George

Gay and lesbian teens in the United States are about 40 percent more likely than their straight peers to be punished by schools, police and the courts, according to a study published Monday, which finds that girls are especially at risk for unequal treatment.

The research, described as the first national look at sexual orientation and teen punishment, comes as a spate of high-profile bullying and suicide cases across the country have focused attention on the sometimes hidden cruelties of teen life.

The study, from Yale University, adds another layer, finding substantial disparities between gay and straight teens in school expulsions, arrests, convictions and police stops. The harsher approach is not explained by differences in misconduct, the study says.

"The most striking difference was for lesbian and bisexual girls, and they were two to three times as likely as girls with similar behavior to be punished," said Kathryn Himmelstein, lead author of the study, published in the journal Pediatrics.

Pediatrics Article Abstract

Why the punishment gap exists is less clear.

It could be that lesbian, gay and bisexual teens who got in trouble didn't get the same breaks as other teens - say, for youthful age or self-defense, Himmelstein said. Or it could be that girls in particular were punished more often because of discomfort with or bias toward some who don't fit stereotypes of femininity.

"It's definitely troubling to see such a disparity," Himmelstein said.

"It may very well be not intentional," she said. "I think most people who work with youth want to do the best they can for young people and treat them fairly, but our findings show that's not happening."

The punishments can be damaging, she said. Teens expelled from school have higher dropout rates, and involvement in the criminal justice system can affect a range of opportunities, including housing eligibility and college financial aid.

"I find it tragic," said Clara McCreery, 18, co-president of the Gay-Straight Alliance at Walt Whitman High School in Bethesda. "I wonder if some people misinterpret the way some gay girls choose to dress as a sign of aggression."

Stacey Horn, an associate professor of educational psychology at the University of Illinois at Chicago, called the study important and compared the findings to racial disparities in criminal sentencing. "To me, it is saying there is some kind of internal bias that adults are not aware of that is impacting the punishment of this group," she said.

The study brings punishment differences for gay teens into focus at a time when public concern about torment and bullying is heightened. In September, an 18-year-old Rutgers University student jumped off a bridge to his death after his gay sexual encounter was allegedly filmed by a roommate on a webcam and announced on Twitter.

Probing the consequences of teen misconduct, the new study examines behaviors that include lying to parents, drinking, shoplifting and vandalizing, as well as more serious offenses such as burglary, drug sales and physical violence.

Using data from more than 15,000 middle school and high school students who were followed into early adulthood as part of the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health, researchers compared categories of misconduct against six punishments. The interviews used for the study started in 1994-95 and continued until 2001-02, but researchers said they expect the findings would be similar today because the institutions involved have not dramatically changed.

Nearly 1,500 of the participants in the study identified themselves as lesbian, gay or bisexual, but more than 2,300 reported having felt a same-sex attraction at some point in their lives. More than 800 were in a same-sex relationship.

The results showed that, for similar misconduct, gay adolescents were roughly 1.25 to 3 times more likely to be sanctioned than their straight peers.

The sexual-orientation disparity was greatest for girls. Girls who identified themselves as lesbian or bisexual experienced 50 percent more police stops and reported more than twice as many juvenile arrests and convictions as other teen girls in similar trouble, the study said.

Andrew Barnett, executive director of the Sexual Minority Youth Assistance League, which serves 300 teens a year in Washington, said he was not surprised by the findings.

"This is a symptom of school administrators, teachers, court officials, police officers - anyone who works with youth - not necessarily being equipped to handle the challenges" faced by the teens in their care, he said. "It's much easier to punish the youth than to work with them and figure out why they may keep getting in fights and what is leading to this behavior."

Hien Le, 17, president of the Gay-Straight Alliance at Montgomery Blair High School in Silver Spring, said she sees no tendency to punish gay students in her school. But she and other teens said parents often become more punitive when they disapprove of a son or daughter's sexual orientation.

"Your parents are the ones who are supposed to be supportive, but it isn't always that way," she said.

"I think it happens more than people think," said Caroline Callahan, 16, president of the Gay-Straight Alliance at Langley High School in McLean.

The study's data set was not large enough to allow for an additional analysis by race, but Himmelstein and others said that was an important area for further study.

Jody Marksamer, a staff attorney and youth project director at the National Center for Lesbian Rights in San Francisco, said the study brings data to what advocates have seen for years: that biases, overt and subtle, often play out in courts, in schools and with police.

Gay youths are often grappling with family tensions and harassment by peers and sometimes with depression or homelessness, he said. Harsher punishments can make for "a cascade of effects" that can "move them from the schools to the criminal justice system."

Joseph Kosciw, senior director of research and strategic initiatives of the Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network, said that more needs to be done in schools. "I think it really calls for professional development about how to address" issues related to sexual orientation, he said, "and how to address bullying and harassment when they happen."

Friday, December 3, 2010

My take on DADT repeal

I am sitting here reading everything I can about Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell (DADT) repeal and I have a few questions and maybe a few answers.
We have gays and str8s serving our country in two wars. They have always worked together and always will. Approximately 100,000 are LGBT. That is a lot of people not matter what! My first question is just what is it they think is going to happen? They keep saying it is detrimental to …..everything, but I am not hearing how.
The questions on the survey where of the “ick” factor kind like how would you feel about going to a military party if you knew there would be gays or would you shower with one.  What a crock. The only thing that will change is you will know more about that person and only IF they tell you.
Who are the ones that may get hurt? The LGBT people have more to risk, from alienation to physical harm if and when they come out. A life time of hiding has also taught LGBT people to pay attention to situations and are generally cautious about coming out. It is not like 100,000 people are going to out themselves with pink fatigues and start a parade.
Why is there a myth that all LGBT people are sex starved experts?  I can’t tell you how many str8 folks find out I am gay and the first thing they do is start telling me about their sex lives! I don’t want to know people. I am old fashioned when it comes to courtship and sex. I do not jump in bed with, nor am I attracted to, every breathing woman on the planet. I am not discussing my sex life with anyone. It is none of your business so get your nose out of my bedroom. Frankly, I think str8s think about gay sex way more than we do. Most str8 people are not attracted to every member of the opposite sex with no control over their urges. Neither are gays.  Again, a gay person would not come out to anyone they feel would harm them so all you Srt8 guys have nothing to worry about.
Why do they think there is going to be more sex going on everywhere? There is a code of conduct  in place that every one obeys and..... they are already having sex anyway.
I believe John McCain, who is just one senator, may have had a bad experience or deeply engrained religious ideas or may be suppressing a secret. No matter what, it does not give him license to act like a spoiled child nor should his position allow him to control every single thing that happens in the senate. He has been a big part in the use of the filibuster which has been used more times since Obama became president than all other times combined. Even his own wife and daughter do not agree with him. Well, the wife did kind of flip flopped around but then, so did he.
The fact is we have a lot of LGBT people who are serving now, would come back if they could, and want to join. The government cannot afford to kick out trained people whose only violation is their orientation. They are all willing to give up more than any str8 person to do the job of defending our country and honor.  
I would like McCain to step into the boots of a gay soldier and give up loving and being loved.

Update: Smithsonian exhibit

As more information comes in about the art work by pulled from the exhibit, it becomes apparent to me that some of our republican and religious leaders need to take an art appreciation class or 2.
The uproar is about a video that for 11 seconds shows an image of Jesus with ants crawling on it.
Sullivan, the director of the museum, explained that the video conveyed the idea that humans are created in the image of Christ and that “we’re all going back into the earth, that we’re decaying. If you look at Latin American art and imagery, really over time there are a lot of portrayals of Christian iconography with suffering, agony and death,”

Congressman Eric Cantor (R-VA), the incoming House majority leader, called for the entire show to be shut down, saying that it was “an outrageous use of taxpayer money.”

The Smithsonian does receive some government funding for the general running of the place and maintenance of collected exhibits. Temporary exhibits are privately funded like this one.

Incoming House speaker John Boehner (R-OH) released a statement which threatened that the Smithsonian’s funding would face “tough scrutiny” when the new Republican majority in the House assembled in January if the museum didn’t scuttle the exhibit.

It is not the job of the government to censor art work.

One organization which protested was the Catholic League. President Bill Donohue,
 remained unappeased, and continued to urge Congress to eliminate federal funding for the Smithsonian.
“Why should the working class pay for the leisure of the elite when in fact one of the things the working class likes to do for leisure is to go to professional wrestling? And if I suggested we should have federal funds for professional wrestling to lower the cost of the ticket, people would think I’m insane. I don’t go to museums any more than any Americans do,” Donohue said.

I have a HUGE problem with the leisure of the elite statement. It is just this attitude that keeps most people away from the museums and galleries. Art is for everyone  asshat !
Maybe you should go visit a museum more often instead of watching fake wrestling.

Art is the foundation of our history. Artists are the ones who has taught us about ourselves before any written language. It inspires change and motivation. When was the last time you picked up a history and not seen art?!

There must be a great deal of people going to museums and galleries because they are still in business and some are government funded. There are grants to support the arts and projects to bring art to the public forum. So it must be a big deal.

Art has transformed cities much like my hometown. Canton was dieing off after the steel mills moved. It was the art and artists that worked hard to bring the people back downtown. It is also everywhere and everything you see and use. An artist designed the clothes you wear and the chair you sit on.  If you watch TV or movies, ART. If you listen to music, ART. If you like the decorations in your home, ART.

Just because you don;t understand what you are looking at does not mean you can shut it down or have the power to censor it.
This is NOT Orwell's 1984.

As a show of disapproval against this act of censorship, Transformer Gallery, also based in Washington, has begun playing the video in the front window of its gallery on P Street NW, and will continue to do so until the video is reinstated by the National Portrait Gallery.
I want to thank Transformer Gallery .

Now even the "wrestling" crowd can watch, for free.

Thursday, December 2, 2010

Smithsonian Gives in to the Far Right, Censors the Artist Who “Spoiled Christmas”

I am an artist. I will always express myself in any way I see fit. If my work is part of a  privately-funded exhibit, I would be fighting back loudly!
The Smithsonian does receive some federal money but the exhibit of art by gay artists was not funded by the government.
I have seen the video in question. I can't say it is something I care for but it is an artists expression on the theme and NO ONE should be shutting it down. I have seen far worse in the name of artistic expression and this is nothing.
Shame on the everyone involved.

This article comes from The People For The American Way.  (These people are working for the kind of America I was taught to believe in. Check them out.)

Incoming House Speaker John Boehner and Majority Leader Eric Cantor called yesterday for the closing of an exhibit at the Smithsonian’s National Portrait Gallery that features work with sexual themes and a video about the AIDS epidemic in Latin American culture that includes 11 seconds of ants crawling on a Christ figure. Museum director Martin Sullivan has announced that the video has been removed from the exhibit because “people were leaping to a conclusion that we were intentionally trying to provoke Christians or spoil the Christmas season.”

Bill Donohue, president of the Catholic League, who has a long history of far-right extremism, is the main force behind the move to censor the privately-funded exhibit.

Michael B. Keegan, President of People For the American Way, issued the following statement:

“There is absolutely no reason for our government to be in the business of censoring art, or cave to pressure from extreme Religious Right organizations just because it’s Christmas. That Bill Donohue and the Catholic League are fighting for censorship is unsurprising. That the GOP leadership is echoing their call is shameful. That the Smithsonian has given into their transparent political bullying is deeply disturbing.

“The United States, like other free nations, has a long history of supporting and embracing art by those of many different values and viewpoints. The Smithsonian museums host art that expresses strong religious devotion and art that expresses atheism and doubt. The museums house art from around the world, from every religion, and allow Americans to make their own decisions about what they like and what they don’t. These museums are an educational resource for the American people, not a political mouthpiece for the majority opinion.

“The new GOP leadership wants a government that stays out of people’s lives when it comes to health care and unemployment benefits, but they show no scruples about using government power to censor the free expression of those they disagree with. The American people must stand up to this blatant attempt to force politics into art and religion into politics.

"What Would You Do?"

ABC has a great show that started up again on Fridays called 'What Would You Do?.  I have seen most episodes and they do try to be unbiased. The show puts actors in public places doing things like a guy abusing his girlfriend, a woman had enough of her kids fighting so she kicks them out of the car. It is interesting how people react.
 This site has several clips from a recent show  about gay people in different situations. It is a kind of an interesting social experiment.

http://abcnews.go.com/WhatWouldYouDo/son-berated-parents-gay/story?id=12275222